- #Landr review 2016 320kbps#
- #Landr review 2016 pro#
- #Landr review 2016 professional#
- #Landr review 2016 zip#
I'm shocked at how much the EQ varies between versions. Maybe ever so slightly too bright? (possibly have this reaction switching to and from 5) The vocalist sounds great here, sounds Like the God Squad brainwashed Porcupine Tree!!! ) Bass guitar is notably muddy.ĭiscerning what instrument is doing what is harder in this mix. Though the vocal is recessed it fails to integrate into the mix. Sounds like the rest of the band is somewhere else under a blanket. The bad = thickens up in the middle (1.30 ish) over compressed blurry in guitars.ĭislike mix 3, sounds muddy yet the vocal is clear, diction might be clearest - picked up on the god squad line clearer here. The good = More spacious, vocal pops out, bass guitar is clean and cuts through mix (until it gets muddy) Mix one sound of a piece, though dry in comparison with two. I certainly want human to be best!Īs non of us know which is which I will simply state my preference on first attempt.ġST IMPRESSION COMPARISON ON SMALL PASSIVE SPEAKERS I hope human is best, and I hope my comments are helpful. The only processing was that it's normalized to -0.5db. Once there is a good number of responses, I'll reveal which master is which! I was trying to put the poll up here and at home recording, but couldn't figure it out. I've got this going here and the Home recording forum (). Or here's a direct link ( sBBk3A/viewform) to the poll: I also put a little poll on my website at
#Landr review 2016 zip#
I created a Zip of the various audio files along with a Reaper project and put them into google drive.
#Landr review 2016 professional#
In no particular order, the tracks were mastered using the following:Ī self re-master of the song, which I did using reaper plugins as well as Melda Production Plugins.Ī Professional Mastering Engineer - John Scrip of Massive Mastering I encoded the files from the original wave file masters using Reaper 5 and the lame mp3 encoder.
#Landr review 2016 320kbps#
So, I decided on using High Quality Mp3s encoded at 320kbps using the extreme encoding settings in Reaper. I wanted things to be as real world as possible, but I also wanted the test to be highly accessible. So, I figured I would do a little shoot out using a song I had mastered by a professional Mastering engineer. The wave of opinions and such on automated mastering seems to range from "amazing!" to "terrible!". I give LANDR an 8/10 would use again.I've always been interested in Mastering and the Auto Mastering online services got my attention. Tell me what you think.Īlthough LANDR is not my preferred way to master my music, it is an affordable, easy option that has treated me well thus far. I’ll show you the difference with a track below. To combat these issues, I’m working out of a home studio and I use LANDR. Although I want my music to sound the best that it can, I simply can’t afford a professional mastering session at the moment. Most people won’t care if your music was mixed and mastered by a professional, they just want to be able to hear it.
![landr review 2016 landr review 2016](https://st.automobilemag.com/uploads/sites/11/2017/01/2016-Toyota-Land-Cruiser-front-three-quarter-04.jpg)
![landr review 2016 landr review 2016](https://www.carscoops.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/f7b92ae2-2016-landrover-lr4-18.jpg)
LANDR just gives my music that final push I think it needs to be listener ready. I’m not as savvy as I’d like to be when it comes to mixing and mastering which is why I watch a lot of YouTube and use LANDR.
#Landr review 2016 pro#
I claim to know about music and recording in Logic, but truth be told, I know about recording in Logic Pro X. I’d like to in the future, but for now and for the price, LANDR is a win in my book. I’ve never worked with a professional sound engineer or someone who masters music for a living. My package only exports as MP3s, but I love it. Since I’ve only used the Basic package, I can only speak to that one. It offers a three tiered system of pricing to fit most needs: Basic, Advanced, and Pro. I chose the cheapest version, just because I’m on a budget. Simply put, LANDR is a way for musicians to master their music via artificial intelligence for a monthly or yearly fee. One of the things that I discovered and used a lot in 2016 was LANDR.